Full Version : Blowouts! (a loss > 5 goal difference) 6+
sesl >>SESL Appeals & Predictions >>Blowouts! (a loss > 5 goal difference) 6+


Inverness- 05-03-2005
QUOTE (SeslDotNet @ May 3 2005, 12:28 PM)
and one manager has quit this season over freak results, and another was sacked for continued personal abuse to me on freak results

The other week I was playing Ludo with my 7 year old nephew and he got very upset because he just couldn't throw a 6 to get even one man out. THis was after about 30 or 40 rounds.

I'll tell him (and his mum) that it's OK because even grown men can't take bad dice throws.

- Steve Turner

Saint Mirren- 05-03-2005
Very witty INV.
I like it Steve. SESL/sunshine.gif

Hibernian- 05-06-2005
QUOTE (ciril @ May 3 2005, 06:57 AM)
If one team is reboulding, it’s manager should always pay attention that he doesn’t weaken his team too much

No, managers should afford to sell only so many good players that they will still have strong enough team to be safe from blowouts. Otherwise, blow outs are their responsibility and no CP's should be returned.

I know there are managers out there who would be glad to bring out Top 11 two matches in a row and then rest everything in third match. But here is a catch: a danger from blowout.

Ciril from PET is spot on.
Playing 2 games full strength then resting for 3rd game is an out-dated strategy and one reason why blow-outs exist I guess.
Any decent manager (in sesl or in real life) needs to have the basic skill to rotate his playing roster.

Queens Park- 05-06-2005
QUOTE (Hibernian @ May 6 2005, 07:19 AM)
Ciril from PET is spot on.
Playing 2 games full strength then resting for 3rd game is an out-dated strategy and one reason why blow-outs exist I guess.
Any decent manager (in sesl or in real life) needs to have the basic skill to rotate his playing roster.

I guess that makes me 'indecent'!

SESL/Moonie.gif

I must admit to playing weaker than normal lineups in matches where the referee is harsh or I am short of EL or have key players injured or suspended and therefore am unlikely to get something out of the game. To my mind it is in the interests of my club to protect my best players from suspension and injury in these circumstances. However, I am very aware of Blowouts and am conscious of playing enough first teamers with the right tactics to minimise the chances of that happening - I can only remember one blowout in SESL in 6 seasons.

Bijls- 05-13-2005
I also had problems losing 5-0 a couple of times....But don't think anyone can blame the commmish for this....

It is the way it goes...Bad luck....If you have had one, just hope you don't have one again.....It's chance-software you know, you never know....

Berwick- 05-14-2005
From this weeks press, ALB said:

There is much bleating about blowouts lately, but 90% of the time it appears a manager got his tactics all wrong. However, freak results happen – look at last week’s real-life Dunfermline v Dundee game – it was 5-0 but both managers said there was nothing between the teams. Man Utd also drew with West Brom last week despite them having more than a dozen more clear scoring chances. It happens.
Blame Olmec.
Blame ref.
Blame Tony Blair.
Blame anything bar your own incompetence!



Hibernian- 06-21-2005
Blowouts seem to be on the decline in recent weeks now?

Is this a change in manager tactics and effort, or simple luck?

I remember seeing 3 recently:
FAL 5-0 NAI
STE 5-0 AI
AYR 6-0 ALB

None appear to have grounds for appeal.

RossHayworth- 06-21-2005
Expect a few more in the coming weeks - especially in the Cup.

Ross
ABE

airdrieboss- 06-23-2005
AI have launched an appeal.

Heard nowt yet though (probably cos Mark's PC is down though!)

Craig- 07-22-2005
Should blow-out threshold be changed from 5 goal difference to a 6 goal difference?

Discuss!

Beagle- 07-23-2005
Leave it to the discretion of the commissioner. After all, what good is it to set a number of goals defining a "blowout" if we're going to allow managers to appeal to Mark for relief anyway?

The cats say let Mark decide when managers are throwing matches unnecessarily and punish them accordingly!

String 'em up! (...next to Graham Poll!)

SESL/clap.gif

SeslDotNet- 08-21-2006
Guys

I am just resurrecting this thread to highlight some good comments last year on validity of Blowouts.

I will clarify what NEW Olmec software does once the software owner confirms. I understood it was a 120k loss, removed from team totals for more than a 5 goal difference loss (blowout).

cheers
Mark

SAINTMANDAVE- 08-21-2006
So is the Blow out threshold 5 or 6 goals? Because I just thrashed a weak looking East Fife Team 5-0 ! SESL/cool.gif SESL/flag_gb.gif

SeslDotNet- 08-23-2006
QUOTE (SAINTMANDAVE @ August 21, 2006 11:21 pm)
So is the Blow out threshold 5 or 6 goals?



I confirm that blowout is 6 goal difference. So its GREATER than 5, and not 5.
120k is loss. CP no longer is deducted.
Sorry for any confusion. SESL/flag_gb.gif

SAINTMANDAVE- 08-24-2006
SESL/goodluckicon.gif
Thanks for the clarification Mark it is now Crystal Clear even to a Blind old fart like me ! SESL/cool.gif

Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.