Mmm,

Raith would like to appeal against the blow out against Buckie, a 5-0 reverse. I readily admit that it wasn't my strongest line-up but I did Stall and tried to keep the score down. However this was a Buckie at full strength and we got punished. But the blow-out rule is yet another rule designed to keep the strong teams strong and the weak teams down trodden. (If anything the team who wins 5-0 should lose the CPs to help balance the league!) Even my best team woul dhave struggled to keep the score respectable.

Please, Please can I have my CPs back we need em.

James

RR have my vote for refund in CP lost in blowout.

The only complaint can be over-doing the man-marking leaving his defence weaker than it needed to be, but as all attempt was made to limit the defeat with Stall team tactic, and the fact the opposition played pretty much top11, then CP should be returned.

James made sufficient effort in this match and deserves a break from the unpredictable Olmec software at times

aye, they'll be dancing in the streets of Raith when the CP is refunded !

Used the extra man-marking gainst the two 30+ wingers reckoning that this was a better use of two low SL defenders.

Buckie have by far the better team, and just before MSA they were very good.

Perhaps we should extend the blowout to 6-0? 5-0 is not that uncommon.

James

String em up.

Use commissioner discretion.

Leave the rule as it is.

commissioner discretion is OK,

just don't ask the Chairman, as he is clearly an arse....